Poverty Estimation In India – C Rangarajan and Tendulkar Committee – Hello friends welcome To StudyDhaba.com .Here We are Sharing One Of the Most important issue – Poverty Estimation in India.
According to recent reports, more than a quarter of the population living in rural areas of India is below the poverty line. Out of the total population living in the rural parts of India, 25.7% is living below the poverty line whereas in the urban areas, the situation is a bit better with 13.7% of the population living below the poverty line.
Poverty Line Calculation:
- Poverty estimation in India is now carried out by NITI Aayog’s task force through the calculation of poverty line based on the data captured by the National Sample Survey Office under the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI).
Poverty Estimation In India – C Rangarajan and Tendulkar Committee
- Poverty in India is Big issues for Government .
- To Measures Exact numbers of Poor People And Per capita expenditure various methods Had been adopted by Government of India.
- The official measure of Indian government, before 2005, was based on food security and it was defined from per capita expenditure for a person to consume enough calories and be able to pay for associated essentials to survive.
- Since 2005, Indian government adopted the Tendulkar methodology which moved away from calorie anchor to a basket of goods and used rural, urban and regional minimum expenditure per capita necessary to survive.
- The Planning Commission has been estimating the number of people below the poverty line (BPL) at both the state and national level based on consumer expenditure information collected as part of the National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) since the Sixth Five Year Plan.
- The latest available data from such surveys is from NSSO conducted in 2004-05.
Government Of India Formed various Committees for Poverty Estimation In India
- Alagh Committee (1977),
- Lakdawala Committee (1989)
- Tendulkar Committee (2005)
- Saxena committee
- Hashim Committee
- C . Rangarajan Committee ( 2012)
Tendulkar committee report on poverty
In 2005, another expert group to review methodology for poverty estimation, chaired by Suresh Tendulkar, was constituted by the Planning Commission to address the following three shortcomings of the previous methods:
- consumption patterns were linked to the 1973-74 poverty line baskets (PLBs) of goods and services, whereas there were significant changes in the consumption patterns of the poor since that time, which were not reflected in the poverty estimates;
- there were issues with the adjustment of prices for inflation, both spatially (across regions) and temporally (across time); and
- earlier poverty lines assumed that health and education would be provided by the State and formulated poverty lines accordingly
It recommended four major changes: List of Recommended Changes are Given below
- A shift away from calorie consumption based poverty estimation;
- A uniform poverty line basket (PLB) across rural and urban India;
- A change in the price adjustment procedure to correct spatial and temporal issues with price adjustment; and
- Incorporation of private expenditure on health and education while estimating poverty.
The Committee recommended using Mixed Reference Period (MRP) based estimates, as opposed to Uniform Reference Period (URP) based estimates that were used in earlier methods for estimating poverty.
It based its calculations on the consumption of the following items: cereal, pulses, milk, edible oil, non-vegetarian items, vegetables, fresh fruits, dry fruits, sugar, salt & spices, other food, intoxicants, fuel, clothing, footwear, education, medical (non-institutional and institutional), entertainment, personal & toilet goods, other goods, other services and durables.
The Committee computed new poverty lines for rural and urban areas of each state. To do this, it used data on value and quantity consumed of the items mentioned above by the population that was classified as poor by the previous urban poverty line.
It concluded that the all India poverty line was Rs 446.68 per capita per month in rural areas and Rs 578.80 per capita per month in urban areas in 2004-05. The following table outlines the manner in which the percentage of population below the poverty line changed after the application of the Tendulkar Committee’s methodology.
Poverty Line Estimation In India . Comparison Given below read and Understand both Methods of Poverty Estimation in India
- C Rangarajan Committee Was Set up By Planning commission In 2012 And Submitted Report In 2014.
- The Planning commission had set up the five-member expert group under Rangarajan to review the methodology for measurement of poverty.
- The committee was set up in the backdrop of national outrage over the Planning Commission’s suggested poverty line of Rs 22 a day for rural areas.
- The Rangarajan committee estimation is based on an independent large survey of households by Center for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE).
- It has also used different methodology wherein a household is considered poor if it is unable to save.
- The methods also include on certain normative levels of adequate nourishment, clothing, house rent, conveyance, education and also behavioral determination of non-food expenses.
- It also considered average requirements of calories, protein and fats based on ICMR norms differentiated by age and gender.
- Based on this methodology, Rangarajan committee estimated the number of poor were 19 per cent higher in rural areas and 41 per cent more in urban areas than what was estimated using Tendulkar committee formula.
- Tendulkar, an economist, had devised the formula to assess poverty line in 2005, which the Planning Commission had used to estimate poverty in 2009-10 and 2011-12.
| Committees | Tendulkar | C Rangarajana |
|---|---|---|
| Set Up By | Planning Commission | Planning Commission |
| Set Up In | 2005 | 2012 |
| Submitted Report | 2009 | 2014 |
| Poverty Estimation Method | Per capita Expenditure Monthly | Monthly Expenditure of family of five. |
| Urban Poverty Line Per Day per Person | 33 | 47 |
| Urban Poverty Line Per Month per Person | 1000 | 1407 |
| Urban Poverty Line Per Month, Family of Five Members | 5000 | 7035 |
| Rural poverty line Per Day Per Person | 27 | 32 |
| Rural poverty line (Rs) per Month Per Person | 816 | 972 |
| Rural poverty line (Rs) Per month Family Of Five Members | 4080 | 4860 |
| BPL ( Below Poverty Line ) In crore | 27 crore | 37 crore |
| Calorie Expenditure | only calorific value in Expenditure | Calorie +Protein + fat |
| Calories In Rural Areas | 2400 | 2155 |
| Calories In Urban areas | 2100 | 2090 |
| Main Focus Areas | Only counts Expenditure on food, health, education, clothing. | 1-food 2- nonfood items such as education, 3-healthcare, 4-clothing, 5-transport 6-rent. 7- non-food items that meet nutritional requirements. |
New poverty line: Rs 32 for rural India, Rs 47 for urban India
| No. of Rural poor | No. of urban poor | Total | Percent of poor | Percent |
Rangarajan Committee |
260.5 million | 102.5 million | 363 million | 29.5 |
Tendulkar committee |
216.5 million | 52.8 million | 269 million | 21.9% |
Difference |
44 million | 49.7 million | 93.7 million |
National poverty estimates (% below poverty line) (1993 – 2012)
| Year | Rural | Urban | Total |
| 1993 – 94 | 50.1 | 31.8 |
45.3 |
| 2004 – 05 | 41.8 | 25.7 | 37.2 |
| 2009 – 10 | 33.8 | 20.9 | 29.8 |
| 2011 – 12 | 25.7 | 13.7 | 21.9 |
State-wise poverty estimates (% below poverty line) (2004-05, 2011-12)
| State | 2004-05 | 2011-12 | Decrease |
| Andhra Pradesh | 29.9 | 9.2 | 20.7 |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 31.1 | 34.7 | -3.6 |
| Assam | 34.4 | 32 | 2.4 |
| Bihar | 54.4 | 33.7 | 20.7 |
| Chhattisgarh | 49.4 | 39.9 | 9.5 |
| Delhi | 13.1 | 9.9 | 3.2 |
| Goa | 25 | 5.1 | 19.9 |
| Gujarat | 31.8 | 16.6 | 15.2 |
| Haryana | 24.1 | 11.2 | 12.9 |
| Himachal Pradesh | 22.9 | 8.1 | 14.8 |
| Jammu and Kashmir | 13.2 | 10.4 | 2.8 |
| Jharkhand | 45.3 | 37 | 8.3 |
| Karnataka | 33.4 | 20.9 | 12.5 |
| Kerala | 19.7 | 7.1 | 12.6 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 48.6 | 31.7 | 16.9 |
| Maharashtra | 38.1 | 17.4 | 20.7 |
| Manipur | 38 | 36.9 | 1.1 |
| Meghalaya | 16.1 | 11.9 | 4.2 |
| Mizoram | 15.3 | 20.4 | -5.1 |
| Nagaland | 9 | 18.9 | -9.9 |
| Odisha | 57.2 | 32.6 | 24.6 |
| Puducherry | 14.1 | 9.7 | 4.4 |
| Punjab | 20.9 | 8.3 | 12.6 |
| Rajasthan | 34.4 | 14.7 | 19.7 |
| Sikkim | 31.1 | 8.2 | 22.9 |
| Tamil Nadu | 28.9 | 11.3 | 17.6 |
| Tripura | 40.6 | 14.1 | 26.5 |
| Uttar Pradesh | 40.9 | 29.4 | 11.5 |
| Uttarakhand | 32.7 | 11.3 | 21.4 |
| West Bengal | 34.3 | 20 | 14.3 |
| All Inda | 37.2 | 21.9 | 15.3 |
Important Links For latest Poverty Data
Important Links For Study Material And Test Series |
Join Our Prelims Test Series 2020 |
The Hindu Daily News Paper Important Articles Pdf |
Join StudyDhaba.Com Telegram Channel – t.me/studydhaba |
Latest Current Affairs Magazine 2019 Pdf |
UPSC Prelims ,Mains ,Optional Study Materials |
UPSC Prelims Test Series 2020 Pdf |
UPSC Mains Test Series 2019-2020 |
UPSC Optional Test Series 2019-2020 |
SSC Study Materials 2019-2020 Pdf |
IBPS Study Material 2019-2020 Pdf |
Insurance Exams Free Study Materials Pdf 2019 |
NEET Exam Free Study Material Pdf |
Latest RRB Study Material Pdf |
Teaching Exams Study Material Pdf |
| EContact US – [email protected] / [email protected] |
| Note & Disclaimer – All Study Materials Here are shared Only For Educational Purposes .Most of The Material Is Already Available On Internet .We Are Just Sharing That Link Only . Whole Materials Is For Education Purpose Only .We Work hard to Provide You Quality Study Materials And Error Free Study Materials For All Competitive Exams .You can Also Share Study Materials,Notes Or Any Materials With Us .We Will Publish That Material On Our Website .It is a Humble Request To All Of You Please Share This Post With Your Friends And On Social Media .
|
